These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 9587769

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D, Gray JE, Swensen SJ, Vrieze TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D, Gray JE, Swensen SJ, Vrieze TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM, Duryea J, Moore EH.
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ, Gray JE, Brown LR, Aughenbaugh GL, Harms GF, Stears J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, Montner SM, Carlin M.
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB, Sokiranski R, Claussen CD.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G, von Boetticher H, Amling B, Herzog R.
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M, Reuter M, Palmié S, Harder E, Hutzelmann A, Heller M.
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two film-screen systems for chest radiography.
    Lefcoe MS, Cunningham IA, Vanderburgh LC, Sparrow RK.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 8640420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M, Prokop M, Thorns E, Oestmann JW, Reichelt S, Haubitz B, Milbradt H, Gräser A, Verner L, Schaefer C.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
    Shimizu T, Yamamoto K, Ogura Y, Aratake K, Nakata Y, Saika Y, Sagami A, Ashina K, Sueyoshi K, Narabayashi I.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May 25; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.