These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 9596182

  • 21. Comparison of electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients.
    Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Brown CJ, Clay KS, Seyle K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Sep; 13(8):416-27. PubMed ID: 12371659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures.
    Seyle K, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):72S-79S. PubMed ID: 11883770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees.
    Raghunandhan S, Ravikumar A, Kameswaran M, Mandke K, Ranjith R.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Early results using the nucleus CI24M in children.
    Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Roland JT, Staller SJ, Hoffman RA.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Mar; 20(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 10100523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users.
    Kiss JG, Tóth F, Nagy AL, Jarabin J, Szamosközi A, Torkos A, Jóri J, Czigner J.
    Int Tinnitus J; 2003 Mar; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential.
    Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 10981604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X, Ji F, Han D, Hong M, Chen A.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009 Aug; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Roland JT.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [The new technologies for the intraoperative registration of the electrically evoked compound action potentials of the acoustical nerve by means of the neural response telemetry method].
    Bakhshinyan VV, Fedoseev VI, Tavartkiladze GA.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2015 Jul; 80(3):14-17. PubMed ID: 26288202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. EAP recordings in ineraid patients--correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting.
    Zimmerling MJ, Hochmair ES.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 11951852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [The current tendencies and prospects of the neural response telemetry in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation].
    Bakhshinian VV.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014 Apr; (2):21-5. PubMed ID: 24781166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G, Swinnen F, Pascoal D, Philips B, Killian M, James C, Govaerts PJ, Dhooge I.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [First experiences in Neural Response Telemetry in patients with Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system].
    Szyfter W, Pruszewicz A, Karlik M, Swidziński P.
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000 Jul; 54(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 10917062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J, Parkinson A, Schafer EC, Gilden J, Rehwinkel K, Mansanares J, Coughlan E, Wright J, Torres J, Gannaway S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A, Papsin B, James A, Gordon K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.