These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 9610330

  • 21. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish.
    Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D, Pines MS, Erakin C, Fuerst PF.
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Shear bond strength, microleakage, and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents.
    Grobler SR, Oberholzer TG, Rossouw RJ, Grobler-Rabie A, Van Wyk Kotze TJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 11203971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond.
    Newman JE, Hondrum SO, Clem DB.
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Microleakage of four different amalgam binding systems].
    Oberholzer TG, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, van Wyk Kotze TJ, Grobler-Rabie A.
    SADJ; 2001 Feb; 56(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16894691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
    Morrow LA, Wilson NH, Setcos JC, Watts DC.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC, Franke M, Maia HP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effect of cavity varnish, amalgam liner or dentin bonding agents on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Belli S, Unlü N, Ozer F.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 11380791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998 May; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.