These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 9610854

  • 1. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Stratis S, Bryant RW.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 9610854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW.
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992 Apr; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW, Collins CJ.
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Finishing of amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Collins CJ, Bryant RW.
    J Dent; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 1430508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A, Mjör IA.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Leidal TI, Dahl JE.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1980 Dec; 38(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 6929645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM.
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Experimental research on the finishing and polishing of amalgam fillings].
    Staehle HJ, Rummler A.
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991 Jul; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 1866610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD, Ozcan M.
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Nov; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.