These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
98 related items for PubMed ID: 961317
1. The strength of suture knots after one week in vivo. Tera H, Aberg C. Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 961317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Strength of knots in surgery in relation to type of knot, type of suture material and dimension of suture thread. Tera H, Aberg C. Acta Chir Scand; 1977; 143(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 899593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Tera H, Aberg C. Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1266536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison and performance characteristics of 3 different knots when tied with 2 suture materials used for shoulder arthroscopy. Mahar AT, Moezzi DM, Serra-Hsu F, Pedowitz RA. Arthroscopy; 2006 Jun; 22(6):614.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16762698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Chan KC, Athanasiou K. Arthroscopy; 2004 May; 20(5):489-502. PubMed ID: 15122139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial loop and knot security of arthroscopic knots using high-strength sutures. Shah MR, Strauss EJ, Kaplan K, Jazrawi L, Rosen J. Arthroscopy; 2007 Aug; 23(8):884-8. PubMed ID: 17681211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tying a loop-to-strand suture: is it safe? Hurt J, Unger JB, Ivy JJ, Mukherjee D, Pizzaro A. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1094-7. PubMed ID: 15846186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security. Ilahi OA, Younas SA, Alexander J, Noble PC. Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14716281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [In vivo investigations on suture reactions under sterile and not sterile conditions. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials (author's transl)]. Thiede A, Lünstedt B. Zentralbl Chir; 1979 Apr; 104(9):568-81. PubMed ID: 525088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic sliding and sliding-locking knots. Elkousy HA, Sekiya JK, Stabile KJ, McMahon PJ. Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 15689871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the strength of knots tied by hand and at laparoscopy. Kadirkamanathan SS, Shelton JC, Hepworth CC, Laufer JG, Swain CP. J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jan; 182(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 8542089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl). Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R, Van Rijssel EJ. Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Suture material in vaginal hysterectomy]. Tsuji A, Ohta C, Ohta Y. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 3973429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical sliding knots. Ivy JJ, Unger JB, Hurt J, Mukherjee D. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1618-20. PubMed ID: 15547532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]