These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 9629427

  • 1. Evaluation of quality of spermatozoa prepared by SpermPrep method as compared to those prepared by MiniPercoll.
    Joshi NJ, Raj JP, Sundaram GS.
    Andrologia; 1998; 30(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9629427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation.
    López O, Mata A, Antich M, Bassas L.
    Hum Reprod; 1993 May; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology.
    Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel filtration on semen parameters.
    Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Mar; 169(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 7504330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.
    Yamamoto Y, Maenosono S, Okada H, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N.
    Andrologia; 1997 Mar; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
    Johnson DE, Confino E, Jeyendran RS.
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods.
    Hammadeh ME, Zavos PM, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W.
    Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Preparation of human frozen-thawed seminal specimens using the SpermPrep filtration method: improvements over the conventional swim-up method.
    Zavos PM.
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 1601158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Silane-coated silica particle colloid processing of human sperm.
    Perez SM, Chan PJ, Patton WC, King A.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Aug; 14(7):388-93. PubMed ID: 9285323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of three substitutes for Percoll in sperm isolation by density gradient centrifugation.
    Claassens OE, Menkveld R, Harrison KL.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3139-43. PubMed ID: 9853871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception.
    Chen MJ, Bongso A.
    Hum Reprod; 1999 Mar; 14(3):759-64. PubMed ID: 10221710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Combination of direct swim-up technique and discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation for sperm preparation of oligoasthenozoospermic samples.
    Chen SU, Ho HN, Chen HF, Chao KH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Huang SC, Lee TY, Yang YS.
    Arch Androl; 1996 Mar; 37(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 8886259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of single- and two-layer Percoll separation for selection of motile spermatozoa.
    Sharma RK, Seifarth K, Agarwal A.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1997 Mar; 42(6):412-7. PubMed ID: 9459085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spermatozoa recovered by IxaPrep gradient have improved longevity and better motion characteristics than those by Percoll gradient.
    Yang JH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang YS.
    Arch Androl; 1998 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 9583361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Improved motile sperm recovery by a hyperosmotic Percoll gradient.
    Carbone DJ, Seifarth K, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Aug; 14(7):394-7. PubMed ID: 9285324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Mono-Percoll separation technique improves sperm recovery of normal and male factor specimens when compared with the swim-up technique.
    Shalika S, Dugan K, Pelesh D, Padilla S.
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Dec; 10(12):3195-7. PubMed ID: 8822442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples.
    Brandeis VT, Manuel MT.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Aug; 10(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 8019090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.