These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
140 related items for PubMed ID: 9638376
1. A case-control study of true-positive versus false-negative cervical smears in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III. O'Sullivan JP, A'Hern RP, Chapman PA, Jenkins L, Smith R, al-Nafussi A, Brett MT, Herbert A, McKean ME, Waddell CA. Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 9638376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome. al-Nafussi A, Rebello G, al-Yusif R, McGoogan E. J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of high grade dyskaryotic cervical smears likely to be missed on rapid rescreening. O'Sullivan JP, Chapman PA, Jenkins L, Smith R. Acta Cytol; 2000 Jun; 44(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10667157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears. Rana DN, Marshall J, Desai M, Kitchener HC, Perera DM, El Teraifi H, Persad RV. Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 15456414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears. Fletcher A, Metaxas N, Grubb C, Chamberlain J. BMJ; 1990 Sep 29; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis. Ahmed AS, Goumalatsos G, Akbar N, Lawton FG, Savvas M. Cytopathology; 2008 Apr 29; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective analysis of 94 patients with CIN and false negative cervical smears taken at colposcopy. Beeby AR, Wadehra V, Keating PJ, Wagstaff TI. Cytopathology; 1993 Apr 29; 4(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 8110972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Histology corresponding to mildly dyskaryotic smears--a study of 190 laser cone biopsied patients. Risberg B, Andersson A, Lie KA, Nordin B, Zetterberg C. Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Feb 29; 68(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 9514800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia. Al-Awadhi R, Byrne M, Coleman DV. Cytopathology; 2001 Jun 29; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 11380556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations. Ronco G, Montanari G, Aimone V, Parisio F, Segnan N, Valle A, Volante R. Cytopathology; 1996 Jun 29; 7(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 8782987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups. Giannopoulos T, Butler-Manuel S, Tailor A, Demetriou E, Daborn L. Cytopathology; 2005 Dec 29; 16(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 16303040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear. Parazzini F, Sideri M, Restelli S, Schettino F, Chatenoud L, Crosignani PG. Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov 29; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]