These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design. Summitt JB, Della Bona A, Burgess JO. Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 8058898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations. Görücü J, Tiritoglu M, Ozgünaltay G. J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of grooves on resistance form of Class 2 amalgams with wide occlusal preparations. Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO, Howell ML. Oper Dent; 1993 Sep; 18(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 8337180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials. Latino C, Troendle K, Summitt JB. Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]