These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 9644896

  • 1. Geometric effects on resistivity measurements with four-electrode probes in isotropic and anisotropic tissues.
    Wang Y, Schimpf PH, Haynor DR, Kim Y.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):877-84. PubMed ID: 9644896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A new geometric factor for in situ resistivity measurement using four slender cylindrical electrodes.
    Chong CE, Tan YL.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):594-602. PubMed ID: 18269995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dependence of apparent resistance of four-electrode probes on insertion depth.
    Tsai JZ, Cao H, Tungjitkusolmun S, Woo EJ, Vorperian VR, Webster JG.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 10646278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Error analysis of tissue resistivity measurement.
    Tsai JZ, Will JA, Hubbard-Van Stelle S, Cao H, Tungjitkusolmun S, Choy YB, Haemmerich D, Vorperian VR, Webster JG.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):484-94. PubMed ID: 12002180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A probe for organ impedance measurement.
    Paulson KS, Pidcock MK, McLeod CN.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1838-44. PubMed ID: 15490831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quantitative in vivo measurements of inner ear tissue resistivities: I. In vitro characterization.
    Suesserman MF, Spelman FA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Oct; 40(10):1032-47. PubMed ID: 8294128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.
    Rahal M, Khor JM, Demosthenous A, Tizzard A, Bayford R.
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S73-84. PubMed ID: 19491443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The four-electrode resistivity technique in anisotropic media: theoretical analysis and application on myocardial tissue in vivo.
    Steendijk P, Mur G, Van Der Velde ET, Baan J.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Nov; 40(11):1138-48. PubMed ID: 8307598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reliability of in vivo measurements of the dielectric properties of anisotropic tissue: a simulative study.
    Huo X, Shi X, You F, Fu F, Liu R, Tang C, Lu Q, Dong X.
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 May 21; 58(10):3163-76. PubMed ID: 23603795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Silver-silver chloride plunge electrode needles and chloriding monitor.
    Moore KB, Kimball T, Steadman B.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 May 21; 37(5):532-5. PubMed ID: 2345011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV, Walker DC, Brown BH, Anumba DO.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov 24; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Note: Characterization of electrode materials for dielectric spectroscopy.
    Malleo D, Nevill JT, van Ooyen A, Schnakenberg U, Lee LP, Morgan H.
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Jan 24; 81(1):016104. PubMed ID: 20113135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.
    Wang JW, Wang MH, Jang LS.
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb 15; 25(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19926465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
    Duan YY, Clark GM, Cowan RS.
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug 15; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A 100 electrode intracortical array: structural variability.
    Campbell PK, Jones KE, Normann RA.
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1990 Aug 15; 26():161-5. PubMed ID: 2334761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Study of the optimum level of electrode placement for the evaluation of absolute lung resistivity with the Mk3.5 EIT system.
    Nebuya S, Noshiro M, Yonemoto A, Tateno S, Brown BH, Smallwood RH, Milnes P.
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May 15; 27(5):S129-37. PubMed ID: 16636404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
    Yan W, Hong S, Chaoshi R.
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar 15; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF, Grill WM.
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec 15; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M, Wertsch JJ, Harris GF.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec 15; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.