These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

401 related items for PubMed ID: 9651851

  • 1. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR, Heinrich RS, Ensley AE, Gibson DE, Hashim S, Yoganathan AP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.
    Kleine P, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Scherer M, Simon A, Moritz A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
    Kleine P, Hasenkam MJ, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.
    Kleine P, Perthel M, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Paulsen PK, Riis C, Laas J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 9793855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A, Benedetto U, Sciangula A, Merico E, Barberi F, Bianchini R, Tonelli E, Sinatra R.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical heart valves].
    Perthel M, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Kupper W, Laas J.
    Z Kardiol; 2001 Feb; 90 Suppl 6():100-4. PubMed ID: 11826811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves.
    Kleine P, Perthel M, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Laas J.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 48(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 11145405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation technique for bileaflet mechanical valves.
    Shipkowitz T, Ambrus J, Kurk J, Wickramasinghe K.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 12000172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.
    Heinrich RS, Marcus RH, Ensley AE, Gibson DE, Yoganathan AP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Sep; 8(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 10517392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves.
    Fisher J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8162222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Iwahashi K, Ota T, Okada M, Tsukube T, Matsuda H.
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G, Schmitz C, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U, Autschbach R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
    Walker DK, Brendzel AM, Scotten LN.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In-vivo experience with the Triflo trileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Gallegos RP, Rivard AL, Suwan PT, Black S, Bertog S, Steinseifer U, Armien A, Lahti M, Bianco RW.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):791-9. PubMed ID: 17152787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
    Masters RG, Helou J, Pipe AL, Keon WJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part 1: Mechanical valves.
    Knott E, Reul H, Knoch M, Steinseifer U, Rau G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Dec; 96(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 3193804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT, Campbell A, Luck C, Ogilvie W, Sauter J.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics.
    Yoganathan AP, Sung HW, Woo YR, Jones M.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques.
    Fontaine AA, He S, Stadter R, Ellis JT, Levine RA, Yoganathan AP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 8665014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
    Bottio T, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.