These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Preservation of the alveolar ridge at implant sites. Wiesen M, Kitzis R. Periodontal Clin Investig; 1998; 20(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 9863454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. Irinakis T. J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Dec; 72(10):917-22. PubMed ID: 17187706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Feb; 15(1):10-29. PubMed ID: 7591520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone. Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM, Schüpbach P, Meijer HJ, Vissink A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Matarasso S, Salvi GE, Iorio Siciliano V, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang NP. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Chen ST, Wilson TG, Hämmerle CH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Oct; 19 Suppl():12-25. PubMed ID: 15635942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):754-61. PubMed ID: 12146535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advances in the use of guided tissue regeneration for localized ridge augmentation in combination with dental implants. Wilson TG, Buser D. Tex Dent J; 1994 Jul; 111(7):5, 7-10. PubMed ID: 8633300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical, tomographic, and histological assessment of periosteal guided bone regeneration with cortical perforations in advanced human critical size defects. Verdugo F, D'Addona A, Pontón J. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 20491815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Mar; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review. El Helow K, El Askary Ael S. Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 18784536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The advantages of localized ridge augmentation prior to implant placement: a staged event. Nevins M, Mellonig JT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1994 Apr; 14(2):96-111. PubMed ID: 7928133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preserving the socket dimensions with bone grafting in single sites: an esthetic surgical approach when planning delayed implant placement. Irinakis T, Tabesh M. J Oral Implantol; 2007 Apr; 33(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 17674682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]