These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
159 related items for PubMed ID: 9655048
1. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations. Ahmad I. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. Koczarski MJ. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior esthetic dentistry--a perspective for the new century. Neuman KA. J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Nov; 65(10):556-7. PubMed ID: 10612932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A high-density posterior composite used for an amalgam replacement. Adams TC. Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10765814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. Roulet JF. J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conservative technique for replacement of existing posterior bridges. Gleghorn T. Dent Today; 1998 Feb; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 9560671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. Sadowsky SJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations]. Favero L, Berengo M, Pellegrini F. G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989 Dec; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]