These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


159 related items for PubMed ID: 9655048

  • 1. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations.
    Ahmad I.
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations.
    Koczarski MJ.
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE, Cho GC.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Posterior esthetic dentistry--a perspective for the new century.
    Neuman KA.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Nov; 65(10):556-7. PubMed ID: 10612932
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A high-density posterior composite used for an amalgam replacement.
    Adams TC.
    Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10765814
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Conservative technique for replacement of existing posterior bridges.
    Gleghorn T.
    Dent Today; 1998 Feb; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 9560671
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations].
    Favero L, Berengo M, Pellegrini F.
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989 Dec; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dental materials for posterior restorations.
    Rykke M.
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Aug; 8(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 1291301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Tooth-colored posterior restorations, 1997.
    Christensen GJ.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Aug; 22(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 9484154
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database.
    Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug; 27(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 12216568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.