These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 9657596

  • 1. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/.
    Whiting KA, Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):218-31. PubMed ID: 9657596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA, Sigal A, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da.
    Martin BA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 42(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 10229446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA, Sharma M, Bradford M, Mandikal Vasuki PR.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Apr; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Sep; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The intensity of masking noise affects the mismatch negativity to speech sounds in human subjects.
    Muller-Gass A, Marcoux A, Logan J, Campbell KB.
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb 23; 299(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11165769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK, Zhang Y, Nelson PB, Wang B, Zou H.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul 23; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jul 23; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug 23; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.
    Bennett KO, Billings CJ, Molis MR, Leek MR.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug 23; 33(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22367094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb 23; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug 23; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA, Stefl AA, Gallun FJ, Billings CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Aug 23; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ, Billings CJ, Hornsby BWY, Key AP.
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar 01; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Mar 01; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ, Andrus JN, Bance M, Phillips DP.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar 01; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.