These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
166 related items for PubMed ID: 9663091
1. Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part I. Material alone. Mellonig JT, Nevins M, Sanchez R. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Apr; 18(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 9663091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part II. Material and a bone replacement graft. Mellonig JT, Nevins M, Sanchez R. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Apr; 18(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 9663092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guided periodontal tissue regeneration in interproximal intrabony defects following treatment with a synthetic bioabsorbable barrier. Hürzeler MB, Quiñones CR, Caffesse RG, Schüpbach P, Morrison EC. J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 9182746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guided periodontal tissue regeneration in Class II furcation defects following treatment with a synthetic bioabsorbable barrier. Hürzeler MB, Quiñones CR, Caffesse RG, Schüpbach P, Morrison EC. J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 9182747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A histomorphometric evaluation of factors influencing the healing of bony defects surrounding implants. Pretorius JA, Melsen B, Nel JC, Germishuys PJ. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 May; 20(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 15973950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of 2 bioabsorbable barrier membranes in the treatment of interproximal intrabony periodontal defects. Mattson JS, Gallagher SJ, Jabro MH. J Periodontol; 1999 May; 70(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 10368055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers. Fiorellini JP, Kim DM, Nakajima Y, Weber HP. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of barrier membranes as graft protectors in the treatment of localized bone defects. An experimental study in a canine model. Stavropoulos F, Dahlin C, Ruskin JD, Johansson C. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 15248878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. Simion M, Dahlin C, Rocchietta I, Stavropoulos A, Sanchez R, Karring T. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 17224028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Histomorphometric comparison of three bioabsorbable GTR barrier membranes in the canine model. Gineste L, Gineste M, Bluche L, Guilhem A, Elefterion A, Frayssinet P, Duran D, Wang HL. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15736779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wüstefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, Becker J. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 18324961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in the treatment of dehiscence-type defects. A histomorphometric study in dogs. da Silva Pereira SL, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Caffesse RG, Weng D, Nociti FH, Sallum EA. J Periodontol; 2000 Aug; 71(8):1306-14. PubMed ID: 10972646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological comparison of early wound healing following dense hydroxyapatite granule grafting and barrier placement in surgically-created bone defects neighboring implants. Takeshita F, Ayukawa Y, Iyama S, Suetsugu T, Oishi M. J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):924-32. PubMed ID: 9358359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. Caffesse RG, Nasjleti CE, Morrison EC, Sanchez R. J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 8083790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and clinical application of titanium minipins for fixation of nonresorbable barrier membranes. Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Hurzeler MB, Durr W, Hutmacher D. Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):368-81. PubMed ID: 9728148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Keil C, Wegscheider WA. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Jun; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic evaluation of guided tissue regeneration using 4 barrier membranes: a comparative furcation study in dogs. Lekovic V, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijelic B, Nedic M, Weinlaender M. J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 9527562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Periodontal and peri-implant bone regeneration: clinical and histologic observations. Artzi Z, Zohar R, Tal H. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Feb; 17(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 10332254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do your membranes have enough space? Bills IG. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2000 Oct; 15():306-8. PubMed ID: 11709961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Acellular dermal matrix as a barrier in guided bone regeneration: a clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Borges GJ, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Palioto DB, Taba M, de Souza SL. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1105-15. PubMed ID: 19519803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]