These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

346 related items for PubMed ID: 9691898

  • 1. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M, Breiter N, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Hundertmark C, Sachs J, Gruhl T, Sperner W, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Säbel M, Böhner C, Dobritz M, Wenkel E, Bautz W.
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001 Jul; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
    Funke M, Breiter N, Hermann K, Oestmann J, Grabbe E.
    Eur Radiol; 1998 Jul; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dilhuydy MH, Bonichon F, Barreau B, Henriques C, Maugey-Laulom B.
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW, Kopans DB, Linetsky L, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, White G, Swann C, Kelley JE, Johnson LL.
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC, Wang T, King JL, Breitenstein DS, Chang TS, Harris KM, Baratz AB, Ganott MA, Reginella R, Sumkin JH, Gur D.
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.
    Kheddache S, Thilander-Klang A, Lanhede B, Månsson LG, Bjurstam N, Ackerholm P, Björneld L.
    Eur Radiol; 1999 Mar; 9(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 10354868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C, Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Grabbe E.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y, Hatemura M, Yoshida A, Takada T, Takahashi M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R, John V, Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Callies R.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
    Hundertmark C, Breiter N, Hermann KP, Funke M, Wiese M, von Heyden D, Grabbe E.
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP, Hundertmark C, Funke M, von Brenndorff A, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW, Kopans D, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Rubens JR, Greene R.
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Oct; 23(10):725-8. PubMed ID: 3192395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.