These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

364 related items for PubMed ID: 9701328

  • 1. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
    Vamvakas EC.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.
    Pain Physician; 2009 Aug; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Meta-analysis: an update.
    Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D, Kupelnick B.
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1996 Oct; 63(3-4):216-24. PubMed ID: 8692168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A, Tramèr MR.
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
    Suzuki S, Moro-oka T, Choudhry NK.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF.
    Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
    Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH.
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun 15; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A, Bellini P, Terracini B, Italian MISA Group.
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001 Jun 15; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA, Jüni P, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Bartlett C, Egger M.
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun 15; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul 15; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004 Jul 15; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Meta-analysis in evidence-based orthodontics.
    Papadopoulos MA.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 May 15; 6(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 12809274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct 15; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD, Dodd SR, Craig JV, Thompson JR, Williamson PR.
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec 20; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Meta-analysis of diagnostic capability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) for primary glaucoma].
    Liu T, He XG.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May 20; 42(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 16762233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb 20; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G, Antes G, Schumacher M.
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep 15; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Künstler R.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun 15; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement].
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF.
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000 Jun 15; 74(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10918802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.