These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 9714917

  • 1. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
    Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Howard MA, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C, Sininger YS, Ekelid M, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep 01; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system.
    Abdala C, Sininger YS.
    Ear Hear; 1996 Oct 01; 17(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 8909885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
    Martin GK, Villasuso EI, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 2003 Mar 01; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.
    Howard MA, Stagner BB, Foster PK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul 01; 114(1):279-93. PubMed ID: 12880041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May 01; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions].
    Fujimura K, Yoshida M, Makishima K.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Aug 01; 100(8):839-45. PubMed ID: 9293764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr 01; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.
    Martin GK, Stagner BB, Jassir D, Telischi FF, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct 01; 136(1-2):105-23. PubMed ID: 10511630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec 01; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec 01; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Harris FP, Probst R, Xu L.
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec 01; 64(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 1490896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr 01; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.
    Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr 01; 97(4):2359-77. PubMed ID: 7714255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.
    Abdala C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep 01; 110(3 Pt 1):1465-76. PubMed ID: 11572357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct 01; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul 01; 98(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 7608400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in subjects with auditory neuropathy.
    Abdala C, Sininger YS, Starr A.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec 01; 21(6):542-53. PubMed ID: 11132781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 01; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.