These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 9715677

  • 1. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG, Ayoub MM, Westfall PH.
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The relation between isometric lifting strength and muscular fitness measures.
    Birch K, Sinnerton S, Reilly T, Lees A.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 8112286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM, Andrew GM, Bryant JT, Greenhorn DR, Thomson JM.
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S, Garand D.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Feb; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP.
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.
    Feeler L, St James JD, Schapmire DW.
    Work; 2010 May; 37(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 20978337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Maximum isoinertial lifting capabilities for different lifting ranges and container dimensions.
    Lee TH.
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 15854581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP, van Oostrom SH, Duijzer K, van Dieën JH.
    Ergonomics; 2012 May; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH, Wu SP, Hsu SH.
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Trunk muscle endurance measurement. Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects.
    Mayer T, Gatchel R, Betancur J, Bovasso E.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr 15; 20(8):920-6; discussion 926-7. PubMed ID: 7644957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB, Page GB.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr 15; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
    Wu SP, Hsu SH.
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug 15; 24(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 15676920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.