These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

258 related items for PubMed ID: 9752090

  • 1. [Ways of using digital signal processing for expanding the potentials of hearing aids].
    Babkina LN, Molchanov AP.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):18-21. PubMed ID: 9752090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Recent developments in air-conduction hearing aids.
    Arlinger S.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 May; 76(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 9170712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [The effect of the frequency characteristics of hearing aids on speech perception in children with neurosensory hearing loss].
    Kuks EN, Kireeva GA, Poliakova SK.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1990 Aug; (2):22-6. PubMed ID: 2360302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Studies with digital hearing aids.
    Levitt H, Neuman A, Sullivan J.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Aug; 469():57-69. PubMed ID: 2192534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hearing aids: a review of what's new.
    Kim HH, Barrs DM.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16730553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM, Christiansen RW, Brey RH, Robinette MS, Harris RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Jun; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An overview of hearing impairment in older adults: perspectives for rehabilitation with hearing aids.
    Natalizia A, Casale M, Guglielmelli E, Rinaldi V, Bressi F, Salvinelli F.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 20391963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].
    Schorn K, Baumann U.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10080122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech intelligibility considerations in specifying characteristics of a programmable hearing aid.
    Pavlovic CV.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jan; 469():181-9. PubMed ID: 2356725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hearing aid users benefit from induction loop when using digital cellular phones.
    Sorri M, Piiparinen P, Huttunen K, Haho M, Tobey E, Thibodeau L, Buckley K.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 12677109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of a portable digital speech-rate converter for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Matsushima J, Sakai N, Imamura T, Ifukube T, Hokimoto T, Nejime Y.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():156-9. PubMed ID: 7668614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids.
    Hoetink AE, Körössy L, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Sep; 48(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 19925331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss.
    Ching TY, Hill M, Dillon H.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):461-75. PubMed ID: 18698522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The progress of algorithms applied in digital hearing aid].
    Xiao X, Wang N, Hu G.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 21(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 15357464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings.
    Bramsløw L.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):634-44. PubMed ID: 20602601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.