These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

547 related items for PubMed ID: 9752966

  • 1. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, Morgon AH, Müller-Deile J, Ramos Macias A.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M, Huarte A, Morera C, Caballé L, Ramos A, Castillo C, García-Ibáñez L, Estrada E, Juan E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
    Lustig LR, Yeagle J, Driscoll CL, Blevins N, Francis H, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Brightwell T, Venick H.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
    Caposecco A, Hickson L, Pedley K.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS, DelDot J, Barker EJ, Sarant JZ, Pegg P, Dettman S, Galvin KL, Rance G, Hollow R, Dowell RC, Pyman B, Gibson WP, Clark GM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in unilateral cochlear implant users - long-term findings.
    Yehudai N, Shpak T, Most T, Luntz M.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 22691155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant--surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience.
    Lalwani AK, Larky JB, Wareing MJ, Kwast K, Schindler RA.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9455952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Teagle HF, Roush PA, Woodard JS, Hatch DR, Zdanski CJ, Buss E, Buchman CA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 20090530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Results with cochlear implantation in adults with speech recognition scores exceeding current criteria.
    Amoodi HA, Mick PT, Shipp DB, Friesen LM, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM, Lin VY.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22090001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.
    Cullen RD, Higgins C, Buss E, Clark M, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2218-23. PubMed ID: 15564849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.