These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Gambhir SS, Hoh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I, Maddahi J. J Nucl Med; 1996 Sep; 37(9):1428-36. PubMed ID: 8790186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. Scott WJ, Shepherd J, Gambhir SS. Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6):1876-83; discussion 1883-5. PubMed ID: 9930463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical economics of whole-body FDG PET in patients suspected of having non-small cell lung carcinoma--reassessment based on the revised Japanese national insurance reimbursement system. Abe K, Kosuda S, Kusano S. Ann Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 17(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 14971606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should mediastinoscopy actually be incorporated into the FDG PET strategy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma? Hayashi K, Abe K, Yano F, Watanabe S, Iwasaki Y, Kosuda S. Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 19(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 16164196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis models to assess cost effectiveness of the four strategies for the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules. Tsushima Y, Endo K. Med Sci Monit; 2004 May; 10(5):MT65-72. PubMed ID: 15114278 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study. Verboom P, van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, van den Bergh JH, Schreurs AJ, Stallaert RA, van Velthoven PC, Comans EF, Diepenhorst FW, van Mourik JC, Postmus PE, Boers M, Grijseels EW, Teule GJ, Uyl-de Groot CA, PLUS study group. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 14579081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Yap KK, Yap KS, Byrne AJ, Berlangieri SU, Poon A, Mitchell P, Knight SR, Clarke PC, Harris A, Tauro A, Rowe CC, Scott AM. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1033-40. PubMed ID: 15875178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 18FDG-PET-CT in the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: an economic evaluation. van Loon J, Grutters JP, Wanders R, Boersma L, Dingemans AM, Bootsma G, Geraedts W, Pitz C, Simons J, Brans B, Snoep G, Hochstenbag M, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D. Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 19944595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Makler PT. J Nucl Med; 1997 Jul; 38(7):1173-4. PubMed ID: 9225819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is FDG PET/CT cost-effective for pre-operation staging of potentially operative non-small cell lung cancer? - From Chinese healthcare system perspective. Wang YT, Huang G. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e903-9. PubMed ID: 22698711 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical value of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative surgery: experience with 241 patients. Kanzaki R, Higashiyama M, Maeda J, Okami J, Hosoki T, Hasegawa Y, Takami M, Kodama K. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 20197344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]