These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 9754299

  • 1. Comparison of effects of low and high tick infestations on acquired cattle tick resistance: Hyalomma marginatum marginatum.
    Sahibi H, Rhalem A, Tikki N.
    Parasite; 1998 Mar; 5(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 9754299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative immunizing power of infections, salivary extracts, and intestinal extracts of Hyalomma marginatum marginatum in cattle.
    Sahibi H, Rhalem A, Barriga OO.
    Vet Parasitol; 1997 Mar; 68(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 9106957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Inhibition and recovery of tick functions in cattle repeatedly infested with Boophilus microplus.
    Barriga OO, da Silva SS, Azevedo JS.
    J Parasitol; 1993 Oct; 79(5):710-5. PubMed ID: 8410542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the effect of two regimens of infestation on the development of resistance by cattle to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Can.).
    Hewetson RW, Lewis IJ.
    J Parasitol; 1976 Apr; 62(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 944256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Immunologic relations between cattle and ticks, specifically between cattle and Boophilus microplus].
    Brossard M.
    Acta Trop; 1976 Apr; 33(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 13630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Serum of Boophilus microplus infested cattle reacts with different tick tissues.
    Vaz Júnior Ida S, Ozaki LS, Masuda A.
    Vet Parasitol; 1994 Mar; 52(1-2):71-8. PubMed ID: 8030190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bovine genetic resistance effects on biological traits of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Biegelmeyer P, Nizoli LQ, da Silva SS, dos Santos TR, Dionello NJ, Gulias-Gomes CC, Cardoso FF.
    Vet Parasitol; 2015 Mar 15; 208(3-4):231-7. PubMed ID: 25648284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative IgG recognition of tick extracts by sera of experimentally infested bovines.
    Cruz AP, Silva SS, Mattos RT, Da Silva Vaz I, Masuda A, Ferreira CA.
    Vet Parasitol; 2008 Nov 25; 158(1-2):152-8. PubMed ID: 18849118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Protection of dairy cows immunized with tick tissues against natural Boophilus microplus infestations in Thailand.
    Jittapalapong S, Jansawan W, Gingkaew A, Barriga OO, Stich RW.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Oct 25; 1026():289-97. PubMed ID: 15604508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Boophilus microplus: the pattern of bovine immunoglobulin isotype responses to high and low tick infestations.
    Kashino SS, Resende J, Sacco AM, Rocha C, Proença L, Carvalho WA, Firmino AA, Queiroz R, Benavides M, Gershwin LJ, De Miranda Santos IK.
    Exp Parasitol; 2005 May 25; 110(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 15804374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.