These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 9754374

  • 1. [Value of a computer-assisted screening method (PAPNET) for the detection of infectious cervico-uterine smears].
    Bernier M, Bergemer AM, Got C, Marsan C.
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 9754374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Gardnerella, Trichomonas and Candida in cervical smears of 58,904 immigrants participating in the Dutch national cervical screening program.
    Boon ME, Holloway PA, Breijer H, Bontekoe TR.
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 22555524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Gardnerella vaginalis in reports of cervico-vaginal cytology].
    Monterrosa-Castro A, Blaquicet-Anaya L, Cantillo-Cabarcas J, Muñoz-Marrugo L, Valverde-Farre A.
    Gac Med Mex; 1996; 132(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8964347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H, van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Bos AB, Habbema JD, van den Tweel JG.
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cytologically diagnosed Gardnerella vaginalis infection and cervical (pre)neoplasia as established in population-based cervical screening.
    Klomp JM, Boon ME, Van Haaften M, Heintz AP.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 199(5):480.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18565490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
    Cenci M, Nagar C, Vecchione A.
    Anticancer Res; 2000 Nov; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
    Ghidoni D, Fabbris E, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Medri M, Bucchi L, Bondi A.
    Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases].
    Vuong PN, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Marsan C, Baviera E.
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995 Aug; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
    Hølund B, Ejersbo D, Hjortebjerg A.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep 28; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Kelly D, Bratti C, Mango LJ, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Mena F, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Greenberg MD, Balmaceda I, Lorincz AT.
    Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M, Nagar C, Giovagnoli MR, Vecchione A.
    Anticancer Res; 1997 Oct 25; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Inflammatory events as detected in cervical smears and squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Roeters AM, Boon ME, van Haaften M, Vernooij F, Bontekoe TR, Heintz AP.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Feb 25; 38(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 19795485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears.
    Losell K, Dejmek A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct 25; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000 Oct 25; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
    Koss LG.
    Physician Assist; 1994 Dec 25; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Automation of cytological analysis of cervical smears].
    Cenci M, Giovagnoli MR, Olla SV, Drusco A, Vecchione A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec 25; 51(7-8):291-8. PubMed ID: 10536424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Review of cytologic criteria of bacterial vaginosis: examination of 2,841 Papanicolaou-stained vaginal smears.
    Demirezen S.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Sep 25; 29(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 12951684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Maximal efficiency of PAPNET in the diagnosis of infections in cervicovaginal smears.
    Polus E, Karttunen TJ.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May 25; 28(5):286-7. PubMed ID: 12722127
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficiency of PAPNET in detecting infectious organisms in cervicovaginal smears.
    Ashfaq R, Thomas S, Saboorian MH.
    Acta Cytol; 1996 May 25; 40(5):885-8. PubMed ID: 8842161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Significance of a diagnosis of microorganisms on pap smear.
    Fitzhugh VA, Heller DS.
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan 25; 12(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 18162813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.