These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
109 related items for PubMed ID: 9754381
1. [Indications for diagnosing nonpalpable breast lesions]. Clough KB, Nos C, Bourgeois D. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 9754381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Aid to diagnosis?]. Chopier J, Seror JY, Antoine M, Sananes S, Merviel P, Amram S, Uzan S, Bigot JM. J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 78(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9499951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities. Symmans WF, Weg N, Gross J, Cangiarella JF, Tata M, Mazzo JA, Waisman J. Cancer; 1999 Mar 01; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: analysis of outcome for 182 lesions detected in the setting of a population-based breast cancer screening program. Farshid G, Rush G. Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 14681944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration for cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Löfgren M, Andersson I, Lindholm K. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Jun 25; 154(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 2110726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic framework of nonpalpable lesions of the breast]. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M. Chir Ital; 1995 Jun 25; 47(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 9005133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fine-needle cytopuncture and/or microbiopsies]. Dagnelie J. Rev Med Brux; 1995 Jun 25; 16(4):216-7. PubMed ID: 7481227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of palpable benign and malignant breast disease. Correlation with clinical and mammographic findings. Langmuir VK, Cramer SF, Hood ME. Acta Cytol; 1989 Jun 25; 33(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 2916375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast. Senofsky GM, Davies RJ, Olson L, Skully P, Olshen R. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov 25; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recent trends in the management of breast cancer. 2. Occult breast lesions: when and how to perform a biopsy for mammographic abnormalities. Robidoux A. Can J Surg; 1992 Aug 25; 35(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 1498736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. Burrell HC, Pinder SE, Wilson AR, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO. Clin Radiol; 1996 Apr 25; 51(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 8617041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings]. Vanoli C, Antronaco R, Giovanella L, Ceriani L, Sessa F, Fugazzola C. Radiol Med; 1999 Apr 25; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]