These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 9775465

  • 21. Incomplete fractures in intact bilateral maxillary first molars: a case report.
    Ito K, Nanba K, Akashi T, Murai S.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Apr; 29(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9643263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S.
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989 Apr; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Restorative treatment for the cracked tooth.
    Clark LL, Caughman WF.
    Oper Dent; 1984 Apr; 9(4):136-42. PubMed ID: 6596555
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cracked tooth syndrome.
    Zimet PO.
    Aust Endod J; 1998 Apr; 24(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 11431809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The cracked tooth conundrum: terminology, classification, diagnosis, and management.
    Kahler W.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 19024251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Improving the way to detect cracks in teeth.
    Abrams S.
    Dent Today; 2013 Jul; 32(7):104, 106. PubMed ID: 23926716
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW, Diefenderfer KE, Molinaro JD.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Dec; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
    Cötert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Dec; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.