These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

84 related items for PubMed ID: 9791595

  • 1. [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Dakar].
    Sow AI, Wade A, Faye-Niang MA, Seydi M, Boye CS, Soumare M, Gaye M, Dia NM, Cisse MF.
    Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 9791595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Karnataka.
    Hanumanthappa AR, Chandrappa NR, Rajasekharappa MG.
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 46(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15027755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Comparison of five usual techniques for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].
    Gueudet T, Lemblé C.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):617-21. PubMed ID: 15596312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Short communication: Determination of methicillin resistance in staphylococci with different methods and detection of multiple antibiotic resistance].
    Cetinkol Y, Altindiş M, Cetinkaya Z, Aktepe OC.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Jan; 42(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 18444569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistant (MRSA) among health care workers].
    Fenga C, Foti M, Daidone A, Sturniolo G, Maviglia P, Di Nola C, Polito I, Mondello P.
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007 Jan; 29(3 Suppl):416-7. PubMed ID: 18409753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Sensitivity to cotrimoxazole of bacteria isolated at the Central University Hospital of Fann, Dakar].
    Sow AI, Faye Niang MA, Dieng M, Toure K, Fall D, Soumare M, Seydi M, Ndour CT, Cisse MF, Samb A.
    Dakar Med; 1999 Jan; 44(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10797980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus phagotype 95 in the Hospitales Vall d'Hebron of Barcelona].
    del Valle O, Trincado P, Martín MT, Gómez E, Cano A, Vindel A.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999 Dec; 17(10):498-505. PubMed ID: 10650645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vitro activity of netilmicin against clinical isolates of methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
    Manoharan A, Lalitha MK, Jesudason MV.
    Natl Med J India; 1997 Dec; 10(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 9153980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of two different sensitivity testing agars for detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
    Fahim Q, Ikram A, Abbasi SA, Wiqar MA.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jul; 18(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 18760064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Performance of different methods of oxacillin resistance detection in atypic strains of Staphylococcus aureus].
    Hamdad F, Donda F, Laurans G, Canarelli B, Rousseau F, Biendo M, Thomas D, Eb F.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2006 Jul; 54(8-9):447-52. PubMed ID: 17030459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mupirocin resistance among Iranian isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
    Saderi H, Owlia P, Habibi M.
    Med Sci Monit; 2008 Oct; 14(10):BR210-3. PubMed ID: 18830185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparison of different techniques for the detection of heterogeneous resistance to methicillin in Staphylococcus aureus].
    May L, Le Turdu F, Dardel P, Bismuth R.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1999 May; 47(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 10418028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Susceptibility to selected chemotherapeutics of Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to methycyline isolated from clinical materials in the years 1991-1992 and 1997].
    Kochman M, Fordymacki P, Lawrynowicz-Paciorek M, Kałuzewski S, Mészáros J, Połowniak-Pracka H, Ochman E, Sztandar-Sztanderska M.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1999 May; 51(3-4):187-98. PubMed ID: 10803247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of respiratory isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a Turkish university hospital.
    Gonlugur U, Akkurt I, Ozdemir L, Bakici MZ, Icagasioglu S, Gultekin F.
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 2003 May; 52(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 14594401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Antimicrobial resistance of community and hospital acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates to oxacillin and glycopeptides.
    Anwar MS, Bokhari SR.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jan; 13(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12685973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
    Fernandes CJ, Fernandes LA, Collignon P, Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Apr; 55(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 15743899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Comparison of disk-diffusion method and PCR for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains].
    Kaczmarek A, Budzyńska A, Mikołajczyk D, Gospodarek E.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006 Apr; 58(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17133901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with high resistance to mupirocin in hospitals of the Gdańsk region].
    Wiśniewska K, Dajnowska-Stanczewa A, Galiński J, Garbacz K.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2002 Apr; 54(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 12650051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Reduced susceptibility to triclosan in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].
    Wiśniewska K, Piechowicz L, Galiński J.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006 Apr; 58(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16871968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Determination of methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus in routine microbiological diagnostics].
    Słomka M, Szymanowska A, Rokosz A, Sawicka-Grzelak A, Luczak M.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2004 Apr; 56(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 15544083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.