These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

458 related items for PubMed ID: 9791784

  • 1. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown.
    May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 9791784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns.
    Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 32(7):526-30. PubMed ID: 15975133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P, Kee E, Chiche GJ, Blatz MB.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A.
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, Akao T, Okamoto K, Wakabayashi K, Yatani H.
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):456-9. PubMed ID: 16279739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns.
    Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 11044849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An in vitro study of the compressive load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with varying thickness of veneer porcelain.
    Webber B, McDonald A, Knowles J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12616235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F, Suárez MJ, Rivera B, Pradíes G.
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM, Chronaios D, Sierraalta M, George FM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems.
    Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 14586310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY, Adib SM, Zebouni EA, Bechara BB, Rifai KT.
    Gen Dent; 2009 Mar; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Mar; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system.
    Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 16159354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.