These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 9796144
41. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 16307568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone. Grassi S, Piattelli A, Ferrari DS, Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Iezzi G, Shibli JA. J Oral Implantol; 2007 Dec; 33(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17410906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Apr; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Johansson CB, Han CH, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Apr; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces. Nergiz I, Arpak N, Bostanci H, Scorziello TM, Schmage P. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter. Tan BF, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Aug; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants. Svanborg LM, Hoffman M, Andersson M, Currie F, Kjellin P, Wennerberg A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants. Sul YT, Jeong Y, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs. Strnad J, Urban K, Povysil C, Strnad Z. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Oct; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Jul; 25(7):889-902. PubMed ID: 1918105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Lopez-Heredia MA, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]