These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
339 related items for PubMed ID: 9801036
21. Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography. Venkatesh P, Sharma R, Vashist N, Vohra R, Garg S. Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 22961609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination. Silva PS, Walia S, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Dunn C, Bursell SE, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Moss SE, Klein R, Kessler SD, Richie KA. Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 2579361 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Alterations of the blood-retinal barrier and retinal thickness in preclinical retinopathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Lobo CL, Bernardes RC, Cunha-Vaz JG. Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Oct; 118(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JC, Cole DR. Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10647713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Identification of individual microaneurysms: a comparison between fluorescein angiograms and red-free and colour photographs. Hellstedt T, Vesti E, Immonen I. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1996 Aug; 234 Suppl 1():S13-7. PubMed ID: 8871144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Venous beading in two or more quadrants might not be a sensitive grading criterion for severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Chen L, Zhang X, Wen F. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 256(6):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 29626228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The diagnostic accuracy of single- and five-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening by primary care physicians. Srihatrai P, Hlowchitsieng T. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):94-97. PubMed ID: 29283131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. ETDRS grading with CLARUS ultra-widefield images shows agreement with 7-fields colour fundus photography. Santos AR, Ghate S, Lopes M, Rocha AC, Santos T, Reste-Ferreira D, Manivannan N, Foote K, Cunha-Vaz J. BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep 03; 24(1):387. PubMed ID: 39227901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Does microaneurysm count reflect severity of early diabetic retinopathy? Kohner EM, Sleightholm M. Ophthalmology; 1986 May 03; 93(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 3725317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography. Lee VS, Kingsley RM, Lee ET, Lu M, Russell D, Asal NR, Bradford RH, Wilkinson CP. Ophthalmology; 1993 Oct 03; 100(10):1504-12. PubMed ID: 8414411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]