These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

388 related items for PubMed ID: 9819167

  • 21. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: a study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Chen F.
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 21546304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
    Alvarsson JJ, Nordström H, Lundén P, Nilsson ME.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A, Amano-Kusumoto A, Hosom JP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Vowel intelligibility in classical singing.
    Gregg JW, Scherer RC.
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 16139988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ, Jeon JY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
    Jokinen E, Yrttiaho S, Pulakka H, Vainio M, Alku P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Speech understanding in noise with integrated in-ear and muff-style hearing protection systems.
    Abel SM, Nakashima A, Saunders D.
    Noise Health; 2011 Aug; 13(55):378-84. PubMed ID: 22122953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W, Bradley JS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
    Van Wijngaarden SJ, Rots G.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The relative impact of generic head-related transfer functions on auditory speech thresholds: implications for the design of three-dimensional audio displays.
    Arrabito GR, McFadden SM, Crabtree RB.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jul; 72(7):624-31. PubMed ID: 11471905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Speech intelligibility during respirator wear: influences of respirator speech diaphragm size and background noise.
    Caretti DM, Strickler LC.
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003 Jul; 64(6):846-50. PubMed ID: 14674794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A spectral/temporal method for robust fundamental frequency tracking.
    Zahorian SA, Hu H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4559-71. PubMed ID: 18537404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Multiexpert automatic speech recognition using acoustic and myoelectric signals.
    Chan AD, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, Lovely DF.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):676-85. PubMed ID: 16602574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Noise assessment during aircraft run-up procedures.
    Bento Coelho JL, Ferreira A, Serrano J, Castelo Branco NA.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Mar; 70(3 Pt 2):A22-6. PubMed ID: 10189152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech.
    Ludvigsen C, Elberling C, Keidser G, Poulsen T.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Mar; 469():190-5. PubMed ID: 2356726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V, Cord MT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Performance in noise: Impact of reduced speech intelligibility on Sailor performance in a Navy command and control environment.
    Keller MD, Ziriax JM, Barns W, Sheffield B, Brungart D, Thomas T, Jaeger B, Yankaskas K.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():55-66. PubMed ID: 27770620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.