These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


278 related items for PubMed ID: 9820213

  • 1. Use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandibular surgery.
    Herford AS, Ellis E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 56(11):1261-5. PubMed ID: 9820213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery.
    Ellis E, Graham J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jun; 60(6):642-5; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 12022099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.
    Kirkpatrick D, Gandhi R, Van Sickels JE.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 12684964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is lag screw fixation superior to plate fixation to treat fractures of the mandibular symphysis?
    Ellis E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):875-82. PubMed ID: 22209100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fixation of mandibular osteotomies: comparison of locking and nonlocking hardware.
    Kim Y, Smith J, Sercarz JA, Head C, Abemayor E, Blackwell KE.
    Head Neck; 2007 May; 29(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 17252590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V, Kumar I, Bhagol A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.
    Yang L, Patil PM.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 25753869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy of locking plates/screw system in mandibular fracture surgery.
    Nayak SS, Pushpalatha C, Tammanavar PS, Naduwinmani SL, Mohan M.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar 01; 14(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 23811649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treatment of severe mandibular fractures using AO reconstruction plates.
    Scolozzi P, Richter M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr 01; 61(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 12684963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of 2.3 mm locking plate system vs conventional 2.0 mm non locking plate system for mandibular condyle fracture fixation: a seven year retrospective study.
    Zhang J, Wang X, Wu RH, Zhuang QW, Gu QP, Meng J.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Apr 01; 19(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 25807421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur.
    Heyland M, Duda GN, Haas NP, Trepczynski A, Döbele S, Höntzsch D, Schaser KD, Märdian S.
    Injury; 2015 Oct 01; 46 Suppl 4():S24-32. PubMed ID: 26542863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A study of 2 bone plating methods for fractures of the mandibular symphysis/body.
    Ellis E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul 01; 69(7):1978-87. PubMed ID: 21549485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.