These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 9823075

  • 1. Evaluation of interfacial bond strengths between amalgam and composite inlay.
    Abdel-Aziz AH, Alhadainy HA.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9823075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam.
    Fruits TJ, Duncanson MG, Coury TL.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 May; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 1999 May; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tensile bond strength of two ceramic and three resin composite inlay materials placed using a resin luting agent.
    Thordrup M, Isidor F, Ravnholt G.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995 May; 8(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10348591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB, Neme AM.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Surface treatment effects on amalgam repair strength.
    Diefenderfer KE, Reinhardt JW, Brown SB.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9545913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera.
    Hummel M, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 15081557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB, Sadan A, Arch GH, Lang BR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G, Cotert HS, Korkut L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.