These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

134 related items for PubMed ID: 9823078

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.
    Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC, Peters TC.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9823078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC, Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen FW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
    Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Groen HJ, Martens LC.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000 Oct; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ, Sarvan I, Chikte UM, Honkala E.
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Kreulen CM, Weerheijm KL, Martens LC.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999 Sep; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 12691278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.
    Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC.
    Caries Res; 1999 Dec; 33(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 10460963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Two-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M, Uçok M.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 12537341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Oct; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Oct; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
    Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF.
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jul 22; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK.
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep 28; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG, Sehn FP, Piva E, Detoni D, Moura FR, Cardoso PE, Demarco FF.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Sep 28; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.