These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 9825553

  • 1. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
    Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances.
    Lee RT, Barnes E, DiBiase A, Govender R, Qureshi U.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):512-21. PubMed ID: 23291502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS, Nawaya FR.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N, Saraç M.
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.
    Jena AK, Duggal R.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 20050741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H, Sandou M, Lin CM, Kamata M, Kawata T.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.