These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

366 related items for PubMed ID: 9841263

  • 1. Utility of the Deceptive-Subtle items in the detection of malingering.
    Bagby RM, Nicholson R, Buis T.
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Jun; 70(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 9841263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample.
    Bagby RM, Rogers R, Buis T.
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Apr; 62(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 8189330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development and validation of the Malingering Discriminant Function Index for the MMPI-2.
    Bacchiochi JR, Bagby RM.
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Aug; 87(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16856786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning.
    Bagby RM, Nicholson RA, Bacchiochi JR, Ryder AG, Bury AS.
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 11936213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles.
    Graham JR, Watts D, Timbrook RE.
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Oct; 57(2):264-77. PubMed ID: 1955975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
    Smith GP, Burger GK.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997 Oct; 25(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9213290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
    Sellbom M, Toomey JA, Wygant DB, Kucharski LT, Duncan S.
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliability of the MMPI-2 Subtle and Obvious scales with psychiatric inpatients.
    Boone D.
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Apr; 62(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 8189342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Faking the MMPI-2: utility of the Subtle-Obvious scales.
    Brems C, Harris K.
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Sep; 52(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 8877687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2-RF [corrected] validity scales.
    Sellbom M, Bagby RM.
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Dec; 22(4):757-67. PubMed ID: 21133544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Impact of simulating borderline personality disorder on the MMPI-2: a costs-benefits model employing base rates.
    Sivec HJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Lynn SJ.
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Apr; 64(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 7722855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MMPI validity measures: a comparative study of original with alternative indices.
    Woychyshyn CA, McElheran WG, Romney DM.
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Feb; 58(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 1545338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale. Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress?
    Butcher JN, Arbisi PA, Atlis MM, McNulty JL.
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Jul; 18(5):473-85. PubMed ID: 14591444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Fake Bad Scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants.
    Lees-Haley PR, English LT, Glenn WJ.
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Feb; 68(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 2034762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Does the disorder matter? Investigating a moderating effect on coached noncredible overreporting using the MMPI-2 and PAI.
    Veltri CO, Williams JE.
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 23118265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detecting feigned depression and schizophrenia on the MMPI-2.
    Bagby RM, Rogers R, Buis T, Nicholson RA, Cameron SL, Rector NA, Schuller DR, Seeman MV.
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):650-64. PubMed ID: 9170301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.
    Gervais RO, Ben-Porath YS, Wygant DB, Green P.
    Assessment; 2007 Jun; 14(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 17504891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The predictive validity of subtle and obvious empirically derived psychological test items under faking conditions.
    Worthington DL, Schlottmann RS.
    J Pers Assess; 1986 Jun; 50(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 3761120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The detection of fake-bad and fake-good responding on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III.
    Daubert SD, Metzler AE.
    Psychol Assess; 2000 Dec; 12(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 11147110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students.
    Blanchard DD, McGrath RE, Pogge DL, Khadivi A.
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Apr; 80(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 12700022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.