These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


672 related items for PubMed ID: 9846420

  • 1. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
    Roy A, Grant DR, Kneteman NM, Tchervenkov JI, Levy GA, Tan A, Hendricks L.
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection: results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8).
    Grant D, Kneteman N, Tchervenkov J, Roy A, Murphy G, Tan A, Hendricks L, Guilbault N, Levy G.
    Transplantation; 1999 Apr 27; 67(8):1133-7. PubMed ID: 10232563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO, Ehlermann P, Koch A, Remppis A, Katus HA, Dengler TJ.
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun 27; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients?
    Gaspari F, Perico N, Pisoni R, Anedda MF, Signorini O, Caruso R, Gotti E, Remuzzi G.
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct 27; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Association between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and clinical outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients.
    Akhlaghi F, Gonzalez L, Trull AK.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec 27; 24(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 16364860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of Neoral and Sandimmune in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients.
    van Mourik ID, Thomson M, Kelly DA.
    Liver Transpl Surg; 1999 Mar 27; 5(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 10071349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Neoral and Sandimmune cyclosporine for induction of immunosuppression after heart transplantation.
    Carrier M, White M, Pellerin M, Pelletier GB, Pelletier LC.
    Can J Cardiol; 1997 May 27; 13(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 9179085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reduced intrapatient variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients switched from oral Sandimmune to Neoral.
    Mendez R, Abboud H, Burdick J, Copley B, Freeman R, Batiuk TD, Cooney GF, Barbeito R.
    Clin Ther; 1999 Jan 27; 21(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 10090433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pharmacokinetic study of the new cyclosporine-A formulation (Neoral) in adult allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients.
    Dotti G, Gaspari F, Caruso R, Perico N, Remuzzi G, Barbui T, Rambaldi A.
    Haematologica; 2001 Mar 27; 86(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11255279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients.
    White M, Pelletier GB, Tan A, Jesina C, Carrier M.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Aug 27; 16(8):787-94. PubMed ID: 9286770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of gastrointestinal inflammation and age on the pharmacokinetics of oral microemulsion cyclosporin A in the first month after bone marrow transplantation.
    Schultz KR, Nevill TJ, Balshaw RF, Toze CL, Corr T, Currie CJ, Strong DK, Keown PA.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Sep 27; 26(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 11019845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Monitoring C2 level predicts exposure in maintenance lung transplant patients receiving the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral).
    Jaksch P, Kocher A, Neuhauser P, Sarahrudi K, Seweryn J, Wisser W, Klepetko W.
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Aug 27; 24(8):1076-80. PubMed ID: 16102443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G, Grazi GL, Sanjuan F, Wu Y, Mühlbacher F, Samuel D, Friman S, Jones R, Cantisani G, Villamil F, Cillo U, Clavien PA, Klintmalm G, Otto G, Pollard S, McCormick PA.
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct 27; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
    Shenoy S, Hardinger KL, Crippin J, Korenblat K, Lisker-Melman M, Lowell JA, Chapman W.
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb 27; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.