These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 9860093

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study.
    Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergman M.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Oct; 53(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 8553810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
    Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.
    van Dijken JW, Ormin A, Olofsson AL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 10559724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW.
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):670-4. PubMed ID: 12901993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G, Hedlund SO.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Dec; 55(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 9477035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T, De Nisco S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
    Zuellig-Singer R, Krejci I, Lutz F.
    J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
    Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.