These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

85 related items for PubMed ID: 9863439

  • 1. Treatment outcome for a sample of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated at a regional hospital orthodontic department.
    Burden DJ, McGuinness N, McNamara T.
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1998; 44(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 9863439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J, Sandham A, Chan YH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G, Barros SE, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF, Pinzan A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.
    Ormiston JP, Huang GJ, Little RM, Decker JD, Seuk GD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):568-74; quiz 669. PubMed ID: 16286203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P, Yiu C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003 Oct; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR index.
    Wijayaratne D, Harkness M, Herbison P.
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):118-26. PubMed ID: 12476494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M, Schneider C, Dietz K, Godt A, Göz G.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH, Pinzan A, Janson G, Henriques JF, Neves LS, Canuto CE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Functional appliance treatment outcome and need for additional orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.
    Rizell S, Svensson B, Tengström C, Kjellberg H.
    Swed Dent J; 2006 Feb; 30(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16878681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Complications in the treatment of angle class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Duterloo HS.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Dec; 105(12):440-3. PubMed ID: 11928145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome.
    Kim JC, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KW, Beck FM, Vig PS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 11113798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pavlow SS, McGorray SP, Taylor MG, Dolce C, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ, McGorray SP, Wheeler TT, Dolce C, Taylor M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S, Aksu M, Germeç D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Bock N, Ruf S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [PAR index of adolescents with congenital missing teeth pre- and post-orthodontic treatment].
    Zhang XG, Huang N, Chen YX, He QC.
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 May; 39(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 18575347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A, Peylo S, Brothag D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Cook DR, Harris EF, Vaden JL.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.