These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

519 related items for PubMed ID: 9864111

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Preoperative diagnostic procedures in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (> or =T3 or N+). What does endoluminal ultrasound achieve at staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy) in contrast to computed tomography?].
    Liersch T, Langer C, Jakob C, Müller D, Ghadimi BM, Siemer A, Markus PM, Füzesi L, Becker H.
    Chirurg; 2003 Mar; 74(3):224-34. PubMed ID: 12647079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Leo P, Colecchia A, Selleri S, Poggioli G, Gandolfi L, Gozzetti G, Trebbi F, Russo A.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?
    Badger SA, Devlin PB, Neilly PJ, Gilliland R.
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 22(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 17294198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
    Guo F, Ren J, Wang S, Dai W, Ma N.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May 06; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Bianchi P, Ceriani C, Palmisano A, Pompili G, Passoni GR, Rottoli M, Cappellani A, Montorsi M.
    Ann Ital Chir; 2006 May 06; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
    Chun HK, Choi D, Kim MJ, Lee J, Yun SH, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Kim CK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec 06; 187(6):1557-62. PubMed ID: 17114550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Modified Wong's classification improves the accuracy of rectal cancer staging by endorectal ultrasound and MRI.
    Muñoz E, Granero-Castro P, Frasson M, Escartin J, Esclapez P, Campos S, Flor-Lorente B, Garcia-Granero E.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Dec 06; 56(12):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24201386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.