These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

466 related items for PubMed ID: 9878971

  • 1. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age.
    Malament KA, Socransky SS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jan; 81(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 9878971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years. Part II: effect of thickness of Dicor material and design of tooth preparation.
    Malament KA, Socransky SS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 10347353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of 16.9-year survival of pressed acid etched e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic complete and partial coverage restorations in posterior teeth: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and thickness of ceramic material.
    Malament KA, Margvelashvili-Malament M, Natto ZS, Thompson V, Rekow D, Att W.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 33010922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. 10.9-year survival of pressed acid etched monolithic e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and the type of partial coverage restoration (inlay or onlay).
    Malament KA, Margvelashvili-Malament M, Natto ZS, Thompson V, Rekow D, Att W.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):523-532. PubMed ID: 33012530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings.
    Reitemeier B, Hänsel K, Kastner C, Weber A, Walter MH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 23522363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
    Boemicke W, Kappel S, Stober T, Rammelsberg P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Sep; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.
    Teichmann M, Göckler F, Weber V, Yildirim M, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D.
    J Dent; 2017 Jan; 56():65-77. PubMed ID: 27984088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.