These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 9879144

  • 21. Tensile bond strength of an adhesive resin cement to different alloys having various surface treatments.
    Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Looney S, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 19167535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of bond strengths between adhesive and conventional acrylic resins to cobalt chromium denture base alloy.
    Khasawneh S, al-Wahadni A, Lloyd CH.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Sep; 11(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 14562649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M, Adamczak E, Lindén LA, Odén A, Arvidson K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Sep; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB, Sadan A, Arch GH, Lang BR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Optimizing the bond between metal and bonding agent in bonded restorations using a simplified silicoating procedure].
    Kern M, Neikes MJ, Strub JR.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):502-5. PubMed ID: 2269184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Bond strengths of two dental bonding systems.
    Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Zabarovic D, Loncar A.
    Mil Med; 2000 Jul; 165(7):560-5. PubMed ID: 10920659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Resin bond strength to densely sintered alumina ceramic.
    Friederich R, Kern M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Jul; 15(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12170846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Shear bond strength evaluation of different veneering systems on Ni-Cr alloys.
    Ciftçi Y, Canay S, Hersek N.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Jul; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17244305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.