These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 9884834

  • 1. An algorithm to detect Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction on specimens extracted for enzyme immunoassay.
    Chui L, Kakulphimp J, Detwiler B, Prasad E.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 32(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 9884834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in different female genitourinary specimens.
    Chan EL, Brandt K, Stoneham H, Antonishyn N, Horsman GB.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jun; 124(6):840-3. PubMed ID: 10835517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
    Moncada J, Schachter J, Bolan G, Nathan J, Shafer MA, Clark A, Schwebke J, Stamm W, Mroczkowski T, Seliborska Z.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 15(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 1478048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Wu CH, Lee MF, Yin SC, Yang DM, Cheng SF.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1992 Jun; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
    Ostergaard L, Møller JK.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
    Tan HH, Chan R.
    Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.
    Tanaka M, Nakayama H, Yoshida H, Takahashi K, Nagafuji T, Hagiwara T, Kumazawa J.
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Dec; 74(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 10195054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Genitourinary infections in males by the Amplicor PCR assay of urine.
    Palladino S, Pearman JW, Kay ID, Smith DW, Harnett GB, Woods M, Marshall L, McCloskey J.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Mar; 33(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 10092961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An important proportion of genital samples submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis detection by PCR contain small amounts of cellular DNA as measured by beta-globin gene amplification.
    Coutlée F, de Ladurantaye M, Tremblay C, Vincelette J, Labrecque L, Roger M.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 38(7):2512-5. PubMed ID: 10878034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validation of the Roche COBAS Amplicor system for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Matthews-Greer JM, McRae KL, LaHaye EB, Jamison RM.
    Clin Lab Sci; 2001 Jul; 14(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 15625979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction.
    Jensen IP, Fogh H, Prag J.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Mar; 9(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12667251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
    Vincelette J, Schirm J, Bogard M, Bourgault AM, Luijt DS, Bianchi A, van Voorst Vader PC, Butcher A, Rosenstraus M.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9854067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. RNA amplification by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with an internal standard enables reliable detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapings and urine samples.
    Morré SA, Sillekens P, Jacobs MV, van Aarle P, de Blok S, van Gemen B, Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Dec; 34(12):3108-14. PubMed ID: 8940456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Sellors JW, Mahony JB, Jang D, Pickard L, Goldsmith CH, Gafni A, Chernesky MA.
    J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay.
    Verkooyen RP, Luijendijk A, Huisman WM, Goessens WH, Kluytmans JA, van Rijsoort-Vos JH, Verbrugh HA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Dec; 34(12):3072-4. PubMed ID: 8940450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.