These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 9885593

  • 1. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC.
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
    Garcia PA, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Liang L, Reinhold C, Atri M.
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
    Erdoğan C, Savci G.
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
    Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pancreas: patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT.
    Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, Nakaura T, Tamura Y, Hatemura M, Yamashita Y.
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17890356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Yin D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
    Ruess L, Bulas DI, Kushner DC, Silverman PM, Fearon TC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL, Parisky YR, Bernardino ME, Costello P, Leder R, Brown PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Nishiharu T, Urata J, Takahashi M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abdominal vascular and visceral parenchymal contrast enhancement in MDCT: effects of injection duration.
    Tsuge Y, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, Yokoyama R, Miyoshi T, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 20650587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, Kim SJ.
    Korean J Radiol; 2001 Nov; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
    Li J, Udayasankar UK, Tang X, Carew J, Toth TL, Small WC.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Nov; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures.
    Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA.
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 8637990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multidetector CT of pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rate and individualized scan delay on enhancement of pancreas and tumor contrast.
    Schueller G, Schima W, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Weber M, Stift A, Gnant M, Prokesch R.
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 16982815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, Brummer LT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
    Brink JA, Heiken JP, Forman HP, Sagel SS, Molina PL, Brown PC.
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.