These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 9888192

  • 1. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A, Zhang JS, Vischer MW, Pelizzone M, Rouiller EM.
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB, Klis SF, Grolman W.
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S, Skidmore J, Carter BL.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML, Laurello SA.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Caversaccio M, Chester-Browne R, Estienne P, Gavilan J, Godey B, Gstöttner W, Han D, Hagen R, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Lefevre F, Li Y, Müller J, Parnes L, Kleine Punte A, Raine C, Rajan G, Rivas A, Rivas JA, Royle N, Sprinzl G, Stephan K, Walkowiak A, Yanov Y, Zimmermann K, Zorowka P, Skarzynski H.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    He S, Abbas PJ, Doyle DV, McFayden TC, Mulherin S.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Nov; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML, Baudhuin JL, Goehring JL.
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Hey M, Müller-Deile J, Hessel H, Killian M.
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():14-22. PubMed ID: 28947082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Jeng FC.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.
    Hughes ML, Castioni EE, Goehring JL, Baudhuin JL.
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):46-57. PubMed ID: 22326590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Mar; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S, Skidmore J, Conroy S, Riggs WJ, Carter BL, Xie R.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Mar; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C, Deeks JM, Goehring T, Borsetto D, Bance M, Carlyon RP.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Mar; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of neural adaptation and degeneration on pulse-train ECAPs: A model study.
    van Gendt MJ, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():167-178. PubMed ID: 30947041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.
    Adel Y, Hilkhuysen G, Noreña A, Cazals Y, Roman S, Macherey O.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):495-512. PubMed ID: 28224320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
    Carlyon RP, Deeks JM.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.