These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 9893513

  • 1. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: an in vitro study.
    Zalkind MM, Keisar O, Ever-Hadani P, Grinberg R, Sela MN.
    J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 9893513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA, Eskelson E, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, Jorge AO, do Rego MA.
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, Brambilla E.
    J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [In vivo adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on amalgam and composite restorative materials].
    Günyakti N, Gür G, Misirligil A.
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1990 Jan; 17(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 2104062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan 01; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.
    Al-Marzok MI, Al-Azzawi HJ.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov 01; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.
    Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar 01; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of sucrose rinses on bacterial colonization on amalgam and composite.
    Skjørland KK, Sønju T.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1982 Mar 01; 40(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 6958163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Surface roughness of restorations and plaque adhesion. Experimental studies in vitro].
    Shimano N, Tomita F.
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1986 Mar 01; 20(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 3461167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Slomka V, Van Meerbeek B, Teughels W, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jul 01; 95(8):875-81. PubMed ID: 27146702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro plaque formation on commonly used dental materials.
    Dummer PM, Harrison KA.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 Sep 01; 9(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 6957572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.
    Ionescu A, Wutscher E, Brambilla E, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Hahnel S.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Oct 01; 120(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 22985005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins.
    Beyth N, Domb AJ, Weiss EI.
    J Dent; 2007 Mar 01; 35(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16996674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites.
    Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J.
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov 01; 26(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 18203499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO.
    Gen Dent; 2008 Nov 01; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation.
    Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K.
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep 01; 26(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 18203458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
    Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun 01; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Streptococcal adherence on various restorative materials.
    Satou J, Fukunaga A, Satou N, Shintani H, Okuda K.
    J Dent Res; 1988 Mar 01; 67(3):588-91. PubMed ID: 3170897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.