These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 9915138

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
    ChangChien CC, Lin H, Eng HL, Chang WK.
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
    Nyirjesy I, Billingsley FS, Forman MR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
    Wu Y, Zhao J, Hu J, Wu XW, Zhu LR.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov 25; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
    Lonky NM, Navarre GL, Saunders S, Sadeghi M, Wolde-Tsadik G.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May 25; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience.
    Brotzman GL, Kretzchmar S, Ferguson D, Gottlieb M, Stowe C.
    Arch Fam Med; 1999 May 25; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
    Guerrini L, Sama D, Visani M, Cotignoli T, Sintoni C, Maioli P, Lanzanova G, Schincaglia P.
    Acta Cytol; 2001 May 25; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
    Eltabbakh GH, Lipman JN, Mount SL, Morgan A.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct 25; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Juric D, Mahovlić V, Rajhvajn S, Ovanin-Rakić A, Skopljanac-Macina L, Barisić A, Projić IS, Babić D, Susa M, Corusić A, Oresković S.
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar 25; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.