These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

609 related items for PubMed ID: 9915434

  • 1. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Obek C, Louis P, Civantos F, Soloway MS.
    J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ, Bock BJ, Cheville JC, Lohse C, Wollan P, Zincke H.
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV, Sanderson H, Partin AW, Epstein JI.
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies.
    Huland H, Hammerer P, Henke RP, Huland E.
    J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1344-7. PubMed ID: 8632570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M, Haese A, Pichlmeier U, Hammerer PG, Noldus J, Butz K, Erbersdobler A, Henke RP, Michl U, Fernandez S, Huland H.
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of a contralateral biopsy specimen in prostate cancer patients with unilateral suspicious lesions.
    Sakamoto N, Ohtsubo S, Masaki T, Iguchi A, Takeshita M.
    Urol Int; 2006 Mar; 76(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16493209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Does site specific labeling of sextant biopsy cores predict the site of extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy surgical specimen.
    Taneja SS, Penson DF, Epelbaum A, Handler T, Lepor H.
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1352-7; discussion 1357-8. PubMed ID: 10492195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ, Presti JC, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Dorey F, Amling CL, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT, Eroglu A, Sahin A, Zorlu F, Ozen H.
    Urol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
    Epstein JI.
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM.
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Dorey F, Presti JC.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 01; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer based on biopsy features: implications for focal ablative therapy--results from the SEARCH database.
    Scales CD, Presti JC, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Amling CL, Freedland SJ, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2007 Oct 01; 178(4 Pt 1):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17698131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy: hypogonadism represents bad prognosis in prostate cancer.
    Teloken C, Da Ros CT, Caraver F, Weber FA, Cavalheiro AP, Graziottin TM.
    J Urol; 2005 Dec 01; 174(6):2178-80. PubMed ID: 16280759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun 01; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Can prostate biopsies predict suitability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy?
    Connolly SS, O'Malley KJ, O'Brien A, Kelly DG, Mulvin DW, Quinlan DM.
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004 Jun 01; 38(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 15204374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
    Gao X, Mohideen N, Flanigan RC, Waters WB, Wojcik EM, Leman CR.
    J Urol; 2000 Dec 01; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec 01; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.