These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
195 related items for PubMed ID: 9921661
1. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains. McKay CM, Carlyon RP. J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees. Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R. Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals. Pieper SH, Bahmer A. Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 8609291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli. McDermott HJ, Sucher CM. Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16777362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. Carlyon RP, Deeks JM. Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation. Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A. Ear Hear; 2011 Aug; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions. Griessner A, Schatzer R, Steixner V, Rajan GP, Zierhofer C, Távora-Vieira D. Trends Hear; 2021 Aug; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):886-95. PubMed ID: 7642827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing. Zhang C, Zeng FG. J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 12(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 21116672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]