These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

541 related items for PubMed ID: 9922755

  • 1. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hørsted-Bindslev P.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ.
    Gen Dent; 1996 Jun; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Caries Res; 1998 Jan; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiopacity of glass-ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials.
    Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Braz Dent J; 2001 Jan; 12(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 11445919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N, Onen A.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002 Jan; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.
    Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 20416413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of extreme temperatures on composite, compomer and ionomer restorations.
    Rossouw RJ, Grobler SR, Phillips VM, van W Kotze TJ.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Jun; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10709555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K, Ministry of Health.
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL, Udin RD, Tanbonliong T.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Mar; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative radiopacity of flowable resin composites.
    Murchison DF, Charlton DG, Moore WS.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Mar; 30(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10356571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
    Sabbagh J, Vreven J, Leloup G.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Mar; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials.
    Akcay I, Ilhan B, Dundar N.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 22458866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiopacity of esthetic restorative materials compared with human tooth structure.
    Hara AT, Serra MC, Haiter-Neto F, Rodrigues AL.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 11949799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ, Connolly J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A, Feigal RE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2002 Mar; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K, White GE.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Mar; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.