These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
767 related items for PubMed ID: 9922761
1. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV. Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth. Royse MC, Ott NW, Mathieu GP. Pediatr Dent; 1996 Oct; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Oct; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW. Oper Dent; 2006 Oct; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study. Parolia A, Kundabala M, Gupta V, Verma M, Batra C, Shenoy R, Srikant N. Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Oct; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations. Ghavamnasiri M, Alavi M, Alavi S. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000 Nov 01; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. Oper Dent; 1992 Nov 01; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Manders CA, Garcia-Godoy F, Barnwell GM. Am J Dent; 1990 Apr 01; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro. Schmidlin PR, Huber T, Göhring TN, Attin T, Bindl A. Oper Dent; 2008 Apr 01; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A. Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 01; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations. Youngson CC, Holguin SM. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec 01; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner. Puckett A, Fitchie J, Hembree J, Smith J. Oper Dent; 1992 Dec 01; 17(5):186-91. PubMed ID: 1289865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]